Ancient sources — such as the Homeric epics and the Hebrew Bible —
depict an era of widespread famine, ethnic conflict and population
movement, most famously including the migrations of the Sea Peoples (or
biblical Philistines) and the Israelites. This is thought to have
precipitated a prolonged Dark Age marked by cultural decline and ethnic
strife during the early centuries of the Iron Age. But recent
discoveries — including the Tayinat excavations — have revealed that
some ruling dynasties survived the collapse of the great Bronze Age
powers.
"Our ongoing excavations have not only begun to uncover extensive
remains from this Dark Age, but the emerging archaeological picture
suggests that during this period Tayinat was the capital of a powerful
kingdom, the 'Land of Palastin'," says Timothy Harrison, professor of
Near Eastern Archaeology at the University of Toronto and the director
of the project. "Intriguingly, the early Iron Age
settlement at Tayinat shows evidence of strong cultural connections, if
not the direct presence of foreign settlers, from the Aegean world, the
traditional homeland of the Sea Peoples."
I've been talking to my studens about the History of Western Thought, and how the measurability of nature led to a confidence in the objectivitiy of natural science at the same time that things like the Reformation and the Wars of Religion caused growing religious skepticism in Western thinking. From the rational and empirical perspective, Thomas Hobbes' view that talking about God was literally "non-sense," since God cannot not perceived with the senses, was more profound than anyone in Hobbes' day realized.
While I understand that social and civic religion is still important in some ways in our country, and that there is an awareness of the need for spirituality in one's life (at least the image of the "deep" person), it is easy to see the real place and nature of religion's status by where the magazines are at Barnes and Noble:
Note that the religious magazines are on the bottom and on the floor for all intents. And even though you can't really tell from the photo, the bottom shelf is actually slightly recessed. That's an interesting marketing statement, especially here in Tulsa. I'm guessing the Barnes and Noble hasn't done their local demographics very well.
Look at the topics of the magazines in that bottom section. Anything interesting?
Oxford
University Press has a new resource for biblical studies that probably
gives us a glimpse on what research tools will increasing look like in
the future. Oxford Biblical Studies Online
puts an absolute wealth of material at your fingertips in just
seconds. According to their database they have 7,691 reference entries
and book chapters, 1074 images and maps, calendars, lectionaries, Bible
texts including Apocrypha, timelines, and weight and measurement
tables–all browsable or searchable.
They are having a free trial running through May. Here is how you can access it:
There has been much news lately concerning President Obama's bowing to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (see here, here, here, here, here, and here --get the picture ?). I'm not sure what is more frustrating to me, those overly angry at this, or the White House for foolishly attempting to say that he didn't do it:
Q And then one unrelated question. When the President met with King
Abdullah, there was something that took place that I believe the White
House explained as just the President being taller than the King. We
took a look at the video, and it does appear that the President
actually bowed to King Abdullah. Did he bow or didn't he?
MR. GIBBS: Well, I think he bent over with both -- to shake with both hands to shake his hand. So I don't --
Q It appears to show one hand, that he was just --
MR. GIBBS: Well, I --
Q Did he bow or didn't he?
MR. GIBBS: No. But I think this meeting was like a week ago, right?
Q That's right, but this is something that a lot of people are still talking about today.
MR. GIBBS: I can only imagine it is of great cause and concern for many people struggling with the economy. (Laughter.)
I'm not really sure that this story deserves the press it is getting. From the perspective of President Obama's intent, it seems to me that he made the gesture without thinking about it (it doesn't seem to be very formal). However, such a mistake can be a serious issue for a President in the world of international politics. In matters of foreign diplomacy and protocol, small unintentional or thoughtless blunders can certainly have far reaching effect and communicate something other than intended or needed. A good example is George W. Bush speaking of a "crusade against terror " and then going to war in the Middle East, or American soldiers in Mogadishu being unaware of the great insult displaying the bottom of one's shoe can carry in Middle Eastern and Muslim cultures. However, I don't think this blunder and breach of tradition gives us reason to accuse Obama of pandering any more to the Saudis than former Presidents. Remember President Bush holding hands with the crown prince? I think we've been politically bowing to Saudi Arabia for a good while as our straw has reached accrroossss the ocean to drink their milkshake. Or maybe their straw has been siphoning off of us? It's difficult to tell.
King Jehu bowing to Shalmaneser III on the Black Obelisk.
What interests me more is Ancient Near Eastern history and bowing. Claude Mariottini, professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary, has made a post which contains some interesting elements of bowing in the Hebrew Scriptures and in the cultures of the Ancient Near East. I'm not sure what Claude's political views are on this or on President Obama, but the information on the custom of bowing is good.